SOPA and PIPA lost 3 co-sponsors this afternoon, presumably
in response to the blackout protests by many prominent internet sites such as
Reddit and Wikipedia. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) withdrew his co-sponsorship
of PIPA while Reps. Lee Terry (R-NE) and Ben Quayle (R-AZ) did the same for
SOPA in the House. To explain why he withdrew his support, Sen. Rubio
states on his
Facebook page that while he maintains a "strong interest in
stopping online piracy that cost Florida jobs," that we "must do this
while simultaneously promoting an open, dynamic Internet environment that is
ripe for innovation and promotes new technologies." His statement
came in response to overwhelming feedback he received from his Floridian constituents,
and further goes on to encourage his colleague Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) to stop
from rushing this bill to the Senate floor.
While not outright dropping support, other politicians like
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) also wrote on his Facebook page that Congress needs to
slow down, citing that it's more important to do this right than to do this
quickly.
The MPAA (Motion
Picture Association of America) also had their say – they claim that the web
blackout is nothing more than a political stunt by technology businesses.
Speaking from what I can only guess is a platform of an ego over-inflated with
our money and ticket stubs, here’s what MPAA CEO Chris Dodd had
to say to USA Today:
"Some technology business interests are resorting to
stunts that punish their users or turn them into their corporate pawns, rather
than coming to the table to find solutions to a problem." Further, "A so-called blackout is yet
another gimmick, albeit a dangerous one, designed to punish elected and
administration officials who are working diligently."
Well allow me to retort.
Here’s the thing, Mr. Dodd.
We support the blackout. We know
better, and we support decisions and provisions that protect the rights of our
citizens. My profession is Information
Technology and as such I’m a heavy internet user, and I don’t feel punished by
the blackouts in the least. I admire
what these sites have done. And when you
speak about an unwillingness to come to the table to discuss options, please
don’t do it without mentioning that the MPAA had the luxury of being consulted before
SOPA went to a markup session in House Judiciary Committee. Curiously absent were technical experts from around
the country. Fathers of internet
technology like Vint Cerf had to make their opinions known with help from the Electronic
Frontier Foundation in an open letter on the web. You see, unfortunately for them, and us, they
don’t have a lobby powerful enough to warrant an invitation to the table as the
MPAA had.
While the interests of the MPAA and similar organizations
can be secured with money and a powerful lobby, the rest of us use the tools we
have at our disposal: knowledge and
numbers. And as for punishment of
elected officials? You’re absolutely
right. They work for us.
For democracy to work, or a democratic
republic as it were, the onus is not only on the politicians, but on the people
to make their voices heard, so that those who represent us can, in fact
represent us. This is the internet age
Mr. Dodd, and the American nerd will be the single strongest force in
determining this world’s digital and technological future.
You want to stop piracy?
Fine. I’m not arguing with
you. But there’s other ways of doing it
than firing a missile into a village just to get one man. What’s required is a surgical strike. But naturally you and your colleagues would want
SOPA and PIPA to go through in their broadest forms. You wouldn’t mind a void where a host of user
generated content used to be, so the exclusive source of what you shamefully
call entertainment is in your hands and your hands alone. Who cares if it stunts American innovation
and creativity? Who cares if this will
cause ripples throughout the entire world?
Who cares if entire domains are blacklisted for the crimes of a
few? You’d get yours, and that’s all you
care about.
I absolutely cannot wait for the children of the Internet
Age to run the show.
The problem isn't with who is running the show, the problem is with the show. Decisions are made by tallying votes and dollars "for" to votes and dollars "against"; unfortunately, a vote is worth only a fraction of a dollar. Until we fix that, we will always see self-interest dominate Washington DC. If you want America to work as its designers intended, tear it down and start again from scratch. Build 2.012 is way too bugged and the current development team has no interest in fixing it.
ReplyDelete